Many marine microbiologists
use fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) to identify and visualise
specific bacteria. Cells are permeabilized to allow probes to enter, once
inside the cell the probes target specific complementary nucleic acid sequences
and become hybridized to them. The probes are labelled with fluorescence which
can then be analysed using epifluroscence, laser scanning microscopy or flow
cytometry. Typically when researchers use this technique to study symbiotic
bacteria the tissue in question is paraffin or frozen sectioned; the former
technique involves lengthy preparation by trained and skilled individuals whilst
the later often compromises resolution. Authors of the current paper developed
a FISH procedure which allows entire gill filaments to be used. The preparation
of which simply requires careful dissection techniques and the ability to follow
an off the shelf FISH kit, further more using this technique a single gill filament
would correspond to the same area as 80 paraffin or frozen sections.
The authors of this paper
were specifically interested in the symbiosis between chemosynthetic bacteria
and two species of deep-sea mussels. The technique they developed using a whole
mounted gill filament allowed them to visualise the the spatial distribution of
thiotrophic and methanotrophic bacteria for which they had developed specific
probes for. They found that in both species the majority of the lateral surface
contained bacteriocytes for both thiotrophic and methanotrophic bacteria;
however cilary cells did not contain bacteriocytes. In one species this was
visualised by dark band-like zones which did not fluoresce which were the
ciliary junctions, in another dark non-fluorescing oval areas were seen which
corresponded to ciliary tufts on the gill. Authors predict that using this
technique in addition to confocal laser-scanning a three dimensional analysis
could also take place.
I feel the authors of this
paper have taken the logical step forward in science in order to use the FISH technique
to its full potential which has allowed them to gather more information about
the specific microbial community they were interested in. Visualisation of the
spatial distribution of microbial communities provides information on both
community structure as well as possible insights into ecological function. It
therefore makes perfect sense to examine larger areas at any one time, not to
mention the amount of time it saves compared to looking at tiny 10ยตm thick sections. I agree with the authors
in their prediction that this technique could be used for other species with
symbiotic bacterial communities and possibly even for multi-layered tissues if
the correct permeability conditions were optimized.
Fujinoki,
M., Koito, T., Fujiwara, Y., Kawato, M., Tada, Y., Hamasaki, K., Jimbo, M., et
al. (2012). Whole-mount fluorescence in situ hybridization to visualize
symbiotic bacteria in the gills of deep‑sea mussels. Aquatic Biology, 14(2),
135–140.
http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/ab/v14/n2/p135-140/
We have only known about this dual symbiosis in these Bathymodiolus mussels for a few years. The phsyiological requirements of the two types of bacteria are very differnt,; one dpends on hydrogen sulfide and the other on methane. So, they occupy different parts of the gill filaments. This is an interesting new application of this technique, which should make study easier.
ReplyDeleteHi Colin,
ReplyDeleteI found the dual symbiosis aspect of this group particularly interesting! For anybody else who is interested, this is a really nice review article on the topic:
Duperron, S., Lorion, J., Samadi, S., Gros, O., & Gaill, F. (2009). Symbioses between deep-sea mussels (Mytilidae: Bathymodiolinae) and chemosynthetic bacteria: diversity, function and evolution. Comptes rendus biologies, 332(2-3), 298–310.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S163106910800228X