In the marine environment, all natural and artificial
substrata are quickly colonised by micro- and macro- organisms, a process
called biofouling. This can be particularly troublesome for ships, increasing
drag, promoting metal corrosion and reducing transfer efficiency of heat
exchangers. In 1987, mussel biofouling alone cost the US Navy more than 200
million dollars in the areas of hull scraping and excess fuel consumption from unnecessary
drag on large vessels Morgan (1990). In the past, toxic coatings such as
tributyltin (TBT) have been used to prevent biofouling, however, such coatings
are toxic, causing significant harm to marine life. In light of this, much
research has been put in to alternative, biologically friendly methods.
Dobretsov et al. (2011) tested 78 natural products
for their ability to inhibit quorum sensing (QS), using a reporter, without
causing toxicity. 24% of the chemicals tested inhibited QS without any
measurable signs of toxicity, from these 24%, the most potent and abundant were
further investigated using a luminescent LuxR-based reporter E. coli pSB1075. The cognate AHL was
added in the presence of these chemicals and any reduction in luminescence was
noted, results indicated that demoxy-encecalin, hymenialdisin at concentrations
> 6.6 μM
and 15 μM, respectively. Furthermore, luminescence was completely inhibited by Hymenialdisin
and demoxy-encecalin, microlins A and B and kojic acid at concentrations of
>0.2 μM,
2.2 μM,
1.5 μM,
15 μM
and 36 μM
respectively.
The ability to prevent microfouling by one compound, kojic
acid at concentrations of 330 μM and 1 mM, was tested in controlled
mesocosm experiments. Results showed that bacterial and diatom communities, on
glass slides, where decreased in density when comparison with controls lacking
kojic acid.
An earlier study by Dobretsov et al. (2007) also showed that using QS
blockers can also control larval settlement indirectly by regulating the microbial
community structure of biofilms and the density of bacteria, which in turn
affects larval behaviour.
These two studies show that QS blockers have potential as biologically
friendly anti-fouling compounds, through either the direct inhibition of QS, or
indirectly, by altering laval settlement behaviour. I chose to review this
paper because it recognises another application for QS inhibition, also known
as quorum quenching (QQ). To me many scientists seem blinded by the possible
application of QQ as a novel treatment for pathogenic bacteria, and forget that
QS controls many different phenotypes, not just the presence of virulence
factors.
Furthermore, if anyone else has found studies discussing
alternative applications for QQ compounds, I would be very much interested.
Both studies can be found below:
1. Dobretsov
S, Dahms H-U, Yili H, Wahl M, Qian P-Y. 2007. The effect of quorum-sensing
blockers on the formation of marine microbial communities and larval
attachment. FEMS microbiology ecology 60:177–88.
2.
Dobretsov S, Teplitski M,
Bayer M, Gunasekera S, Proksch P, Paul VJ. 2011. Inhibition of marine
biofouling by bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors. Biofouling 27:893–905.
Morgan D. 1990.
Two firms race to derive profits from mussels glue: despite gaps in their
knowledge of how the mollusk produces the adhesive, scientists hope to recreate
it. Scientist 4, 1