Bacteria associated with coral are proving to be
increasingly important in coral health. It is already known that successful
establishment and survival of a coral reef is made possible by symbiosis of
dinoflagellates belonging to the genus Symbiodinium, however, it is not known
just how extensive the bacterial interactions or what benefit each type of bacteria
confers to the coral or is conferred upon the bacteria by the coral. This study
points out that this is mainly due to a lack of replicability in previous
studies on the natural variation of the bacterial community within the coral
holobiont.
This study used a variety of techniques in order to assess
the diversity of bacteria associated with two different types of coral Acropora hyacinthus and Stylophora pistillata, including
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and Principle component analysis
(PCA). This allows the study more power when it comes to drawing any sort of
conclusion. The samples that they collected were from three different sites across
the Great Barrier Reef around Heron Island, Tenements, Harry’s Bommie and
Wistari reef. They took 69 coral samples and 12 samples of the water. The water
samples taken by the authors allows them to run the same tests upon the water
around the reef, which in turn allows them to rule out bacterial contamination
from the surrounding water when drawing conclusions about the natural diversity
of coral associated bacteria.
This study found that the bacterial communities which were
identified in both A. hyacinthus and S. pistillata were not only significantly
different from each other but differed significantly between the sampling
sites. This can lead to the conclusion that different corals have different
requirements which results in a diverse bacterial community across the
different coral species. The differing communities between sites is an
interesting find though as this could lead to the speculation that the
bacterial community can also be influenced by the environment as well. The authors
of this paper have certainly entertained the thought particularly in the case
of coral pathogens as the authors found several Vibrio spp. on apparently
healthy corals as well. They also state that ‘local small-scale oceanographic processes
may affect the bacterial communities associated with the coral colonies’. In addition to the main findings the authors
also found that a group of γ-proteobacteria were present across the sites. There
wasn’t enough data available to the authors to be able to properly classify the
bacteria into genera so they were instead placed under the term of Type A
associates. The paper goes on to state that even though these Type A associates
are relatively common on reef corals their precise function has not yet been
determined, perhaps extra research into these associates would be prudent in
order to more fully understand the coral-bacteria associations that are
present.
Kvennefors ECE., Sampayo E., Ridgway T., Barnes AC.,
Hoegh-Guldberg O.,2010, Bacterial Communities of Two Ubiquitous Great Barrier
Reef Corals Reveals Both Sites- and Species-Specificity of Common Bacterial Associates,
PLoS ONE 5(4)
Hi Daniel,
ReplyDeleteYou've speculated that the differences in bacterial communities between sites could be influenced by the environmental conditions of the site, but I was wondering, is this the only influencing factor or could other factors play a part? Could human encroachment or pollution play a part?
Does this mean that these organisms are symbiotic only due to the environment they find themselves in?