Epulopiscium sp. are an important bacterial species due to their link
between bacteria and eukaryotic organisms, and unusual size. There are
excessively large in comparison to other bacteria it that they are over 600um
long, which appears to be a trait that has been negatively selected out in
other species of bacteria. Those that do develop a larger overall size tend to
maintain a small volume cytoplasm by the inclusion of a vaccuole. Again, Epulopiscium
differs here in that they contain a high volume cytoplasm. These factors
possibly benefit the fact that the bacteria are found in symbiosis with
surgeonfish.
Mendell et al (2008) consider the implications of size in terms of the genome
and the cells as a whole. N. tonganus (surgeonfish) were collected by spearfishing on
reefs around Liard Island, Australia. Samples of Epulopiscium sp were isolated from the intestine and individual
Type B cells were selected using a micropipettor. Samples were 5000
‘mother’ bacteria with immature offspring and 5000 ‘mother’ bacteria with
mature offspring, both groups of offspring being held internally.
The volumes of the cells were recorded by observing them under a microscope. The DNA was extracted using methods based on standard procedures, then quantified using PicoGreen assays. DNA was amplified using TaqMan Quantitative PCR Assays, and real-time quantitative PCR. Statistical analysis was carried out, comparing the genome size with the volume of the cell.
The volumes of the cells were recorded by observing them under a microscope. The DNA was extracted using methods based on standard procedures, then quantified using PicoGreen assays. DNA was amplified using TaqMan Quantitative PCR Assays, and real-time quantitative PCR. Statistical analysis was carried out, comparing the genome size with the volume of the cell.
In terms of the number of copies of genes in relation to cytoplasmic
volume, there is no relationship amongst small cells, followed by a linear
relationship when the cells reach a threshold size. This supports the proposed
theory that their genome is composed of several copies of a smaller genome: immature
offspring, that have smaller cytoplasmic volumes, develop a complete copy of
their genome (represented the lag phase), the small genome replicates throughout the rest
of development (the linear phase).
Mature offspring were found to contain almost 3 times the amount of DNA as
immature offspring. This size difference suggests the offspring only inherit a
small proportion of the parental DNA. Large cells contain on average
approximately 50,000 to 120, 000 copies of the specific genes investigated
(ftsZ, dnaA, recA), and 370,000 copies of 16S rRNA. The copy numbers of the
first 3 were statistically similar, support the theory that extreme polyploidy
occurs. The values for small cells varied, most likely since they were only
part way through development.
The copies of the genome are
not always identical. This variation hints at a link to eukaryotic organisms in
that a specific copy of the genome can be responsible for one function of the
bacteria and therefore varies slightly, whilst another copy can take responsibility
for another function. Polyploidy allows organisms with unstable regions of some
of the genome copies to survive with the stability provided by the other copies that are stable.
The 16S rRNA sequence was
found to contain coding regions for several operons. Operons are known to
respond to inducers and repressors, which control replication. In terms of using
the PCR method for this genome, the natural method of replication may not be represented
due to the potential for the operons to control replication highly, in a
natural state.
The figures stated, such as
gene copy numbers, were noted as being estimates due to high variation amongst
samples. Bacteria replicate at a high rate, and the fact that the bacteria were
not halted at a specific point in their life cycle; they will be at different
stages of development, even though they are classified loosely as mature or
immature it is difficult to specific when only used two groups. When culturing
bacteria, it is possible to stop replication at a specific point, such as in E. coli; Epulopiscium sp. cannot be cultured, therefore this is not
possible.
The success of the bacteria as
part of a symbiotic relationship and the highly suggested polyploidy present
supports the idea that polyploidy is beneficial for symbiotic relationships.
Polyploidy allows for rapid cell division and metabolic differentiation. These
factors could therefore be vital for successful symbiosis. Polyploidy has also
been shown correlate with cell size. Epulopiscium sp. are extremely large, which aids in avoiding
predation when in the digestive tract of surgeonfish.
It would be interesting to
work with an organism that can be cultured, and that can form a symbiotic
relationship, and remove the polyploidy ability of the genome or sequences that
are responsible for varying metabolic pathways, observing the effect of the
survival of the bacteria. However many bacteria that form thrive in or on a
host have be deemed not possible to culture at present, including Vibrio fischeri (in Euprymna scolopes) and sulphur-oxidising bacteria in Riftia pachyptila. It would be highly beneficial to develop methods
to culture these in order to gain further understanding. It would also be
interesting to know at what point during development of the bacterial species a
symbiotic relationship occurred: does the bacteria become too large to survive
without the high nutrient content found in the fish’s intestine, or did the
host environment pressurize the bacteria to develop?
Mendell, J. E; Clements,K. D; Choat, J. C; and Angert, E. R (2008) Extreme polyploidy
in a large bacterium, Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A, 105(18): 6730–6734
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/18/6730.full
Hey Megan,
ReplyDeleteI previously reviewed a paper regarding the attack of marine microalgae on copepods. They suggested that the small size of the microalage disguised them as prey, allowing the attack of the copepods without being noticed! I thought this was quite an interesting technique! In the case of this paper, I was just wondering why the large size of the Epulopiscium sp. prevents predation when in the intestine of the surgeonfish? Did the authors suggest any reason for this?
Thanks,
Aimee
Hi Aimee,
ReplyDeleteYes it is true that a small size is an advantage in marine bacteria, such as those that inhabit marine snow: the smaller size means that the bacteria are less noticeable to predators, and indeed in the interesting example in the paper you reviewed of a predator hiding amongst prey. I’d say the main differences between these is that Epulopiscium sp. inhabit the intestine of the surgeonfish, which would select against smaller organisms as they are easy prey to any predators larger than them, since there are limited regions to escape to. Epulopiscium sp. are of such a large size that they only fall prey to a few predatory bacteria in the intestines of the surgeonfish.
Also, these bacteria are not predatory and therefore would not need to rely on techniques such as those you mentioned to aid them in obtaining a feed source: they metabolize the food eaten by the host.
In this case, and presumable others that inhabit only fish intestines, it would benefit being a large size.
Thanks for your interest.
Hi Megan,
ReplyDeleteI was wondering if the authors mentioned their "vivipary" as a reason for their large genome and size at all? I found it really interesting that a bacterium has a daily life cycle as well as effectively giving birth to two or three offspring (Flint et al. 2005) and can imagine that this has the potential to drastically change the characteristics of Epulopiscium sp. in comparison to other similar microbes.
Another point that I'd found when looking in to them before was that they have possess a complex of internal folded membranes, or tubules, which is a level of organisation not usually found in bacteria (Montgomery and Pollak, 1988). I think that someone should definitely try to look in to the evolutionary implications of such a bacterium.
Robyn
Montgomery, W., Pollak, P. (1988) Epulopiscium fishelsoni N. G., N. Sp., a Protist of Uncertain Taxonomic Affinities from the Gut of an Herbivorous Reef Fish. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 39, 565-569
Flint, J., Drzymalski, D., Montgomery, W., Southam, G., Angert, E. (2005) Nocturnal Production of Endospores in Natural Populations of Epulopiscium-like Surgeonfish Symbionts. J. Bacteriol. 187, 7460-7470
Megan - I need to point out one small but important correction needed - Vibrio fischeri (from Euprymna scolopes) is readily cultured - indeed, that is why we have such good insights into that symbiosis.
ReplyDelete