Chronic Rhinosinusitis is one of the most common respiratory
tract disorders in Europe, affecting 10% of the population. This disease is
characterised by inflammation of the paranasal sinuses and nasal airway and is
classified as chronic if it lasts for 12 consecutive weeks or more. Current therapy
involves topical steroids and nasal douching for chronic disorders and
antibiotics for acute, however these methods have been criticised as ineffective
and in some exacerbated cases surgery may be warranted to remove mucin build up and nasal blockage.
This recalcitrance to medical therapy is due to the biofilm forming
capabilities of the bacteria responsible (mostly Staphylococci spp.) which
enables a 1000fold increase in resistance to antibiotics. Several novel methods
have been proposed for treating biofilms, most predominant of which involves
degrading the extracellular DNA (eDNA) which provides stabilisation of the biofilm
structure, enhanced adhesion capabilities and enhanced exchange of genetic material.
Extracellular deoxyribonucleases (eDNAses) exist which catabolise the eDNA, thus
disrupting the existing biofilm.
The authors of this study collected mucin from patients
suffering from Chronic Rhinosinusitis and applied the afore mentioned eDNAse,
called NucB, isolated from a marine strain of the gram positive bacterium Bacillus
licheniformis. Confirmation of biofilm formation and structure was obtained
using transmission electron microscopy. The authors applied the NucB to the
infected mucus and observed the subsequent degradation of the biofilm. The
results of this study show no extracellular biofilm observed in the treated
samples.
The authors conclude that this test shows a novel
therapeutic methodology which shows promising prospects for the future and
whilst I agree with this, I can’t help but point out that this study is only in vitro and clinical trials are a very
lengthy and very costly process, often ending prematurely and in disappointment.
Nevertheless, ultimately all medical therapies must start somewhere and this
study shows that NucB undoubtedly has potential for the control of biofilms. It
will be interesting to see the results of the in vivo study on the same enzyme, which is currently being
undertaken by the same research group in Newcastle (this is stated in the paper
and as far as I know is still underway).
REF: Shields, R.C., Mokhtar, N., Ford, M. et al (2013) Efficacy of a Marine Bacterial Nuclease against Biofilm Forming Microorganisms Isolated from Chronic Rhinosinusitis. PLoS One, 8 (2), e55339. (Published online)
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575374/
REF: Shields, R.C., Mokhtar, N., Ford, M. et al (2013) Efficacy of a Marine Bacterial Nuclease against Biofilm Forming Microorganisms Isolated from Chronic Rhinosinusitis. PLoS One, 8 (2), e55339. (Published online)
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575374/
Hello there Harrison, what an interesting read! I was just wondering if the NucB enzyme can be used to degrade biofilms ex vivo on oil pipe lines? Also, do you know if it works on Staphylococci species?
ReplyDeleteOne more thing, could you please put the reference up for the paper you have used?
Thanks!
Sorry I meant does it work without Staphylococci species!
ReplyDeleteHey Hannah,
ReplyDeleteSorry I always forget to reference! I've edited the post so it should be on there.
In answer to your questions; The authors did mention the possibility of an ex vivo usage, but from what I could gather they were far more interested in the medical potential than the engineering potential of the enzyme. From purely speculation I would guess that maybe the amount of enzyme needed to significantly degrade biofilm ex vivo would be impractical due to washing away, eating etc. whereas in vivo the enzyme is contained.
Due to the specificity of enzymes I would assume that NucB only works on staph spp., however the authors do make mention of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Vibrio cholerae, but state that they produce "thicker biofilms" and offer no further explanation of if the enzyme would work or not!
Brilliant, do you know of any similar papers which look in to the bioengineering side of these applications?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the quick response!