One of the infectious causative agents of epidemic
gastroenteritis are noroviruses, of which there are five genogroups, each
including several genotypes; GGI (including Norwalk and Southampton genotypes),
GGII (Hawaii and others), GGIII (Jena), GGIV (Alphatron) and GGV (found in
mice). Inadequate or failing treatment of sewage leads to the insufficient
removal of viruses and the discharge of this sewage may significantly enhance
the concentration of viruses in the environment, potentially leading to
virus-contaminated drinking or recreational water. Lodder & Husman (2005)
investigated the contamination present in the Waal and Maas Rivers in the
Netherlands and compared this to raw and treated sewage from the Apeldoorn
pumping-engine station, Netherlands, and to norovirus stool sample specimens.
They used molecular methods for enumeration and sequencing of the virus
particles as well as cell culture for enumeration of plaque forming units. The
River Waal is a tributary of the River Rhine and is composed of rain and melt
water and approximately 30 million people depend upon it for drinking water,
while the River Maas is made of just rainwater and approximately 5 million
people depend upon it for drinking water.
Lodder & Husman (2005) found that each river was positive
for the presence of F-specific and somatic phages, noroviruses, rotaviruses,
reoviruses and enteroviruses and seven norovirus genotype strains were found
out of a total of 38 clones. Four different norovirus genotypes were found in
the River Maas; QueensArms, Mexico, Lordsdale and the Maas/Waal strain, while
five norovirus genotypes were found in the River Waal; Southampton, Rotterdam,
Lordsdale, Leeds and the Maas/Waal strain. The average virus concentrations
were lower in treated sewage than raw sewage, except for rotaviruses, and virus
removal at the treatment plant was 1.6, 1.1, 1.4, 1.3, 1.8 and 0.2 log10
units for F-specific phages, somatic phages, enteroviruses, reoviruses,
noroviruses and rotaviruses, respectively. Each sewage sample contained at
least one strain of norovirus; the raw sewage samples contained six norovirus
genotype strains while the treated sewage samples contained five norovirus
genotype strains and Southampton, Mexico and Lordsdale genotypes were present
in both.
This study highlights the need for more rigorous procedures
aimed at removing viruses from sewage at treatment plants. Viruses can be
effectively removed or inactivated by slow sand filtration and soil passage,
however they are more resistant to UV and coagulation combined with
sedimentation. This shows that consumption of drinking water or exposure to
surface waters through recreation or shellfish could pose a risk if it
coincides with failed treatment, however the screening period of the rivers was
not extensive as it spanned only November through to April, when Noroviruses
are known to be more prevalent so further investigation needs to determine
whether the risk still occurs in the summer.
Lodder, W. & Husman, A. (2005) Presence of Noroviruses
and other enteric viruses in sewage and surface waters in the Netherlands. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 71, 1453-1461
hey, you stated that the viruses in non treated samples were higher, was there a number for the levels in untreated so that there can be a sort of ratio worked out, as this links in with a paper i reviewd and id be quite interested to see how the netherlands fair to the high levels of viruses and sewage produced in the paper i reviewed, many thanks
ReplyDeleteOllie.