A previous study by Burke et al. (2011a) analysed the
species composition of Ulva australis
associated bacterial communities (covered in my earlier blog). Surprisingly, it
was found that there is very little phylogenetic similarity between bacterial
communities on different U. australis
samples (15% similarity). To explain this variability in community structure,
Burke et al. proposed a competitive lottery hypothesis which states that
community composition is determined by the functional roles needed to colonise
ecological niches. In terms of bacteria, this means there are ‘pools’ of
species which share functional roles and any species from within these pools
may colonise an ecological niche, depending on who gets there first.
Importantly, members of each pool may be phylogenetically related or unrelated.
To test the competitive lottery model, Burke et al. (2011b)
set out to show that algal-associated bacterial communities are functionally
distinct from the surrounding seawater, but contain a core of functional genes
which are present across all algal samples.
Bacterial DNA was extracted from six individual U. australis samples and eight seawater
samples (corresponding to samples from Burke et al. (2011a)). DNA samples were
then cut down to a small size (around 2 kb) and large scale shotgun sequencing
was then performed (a method of sampling an entire genome by aligning the
overlap among small samples of DNA).
Results showed that algal-associated communities were
functionally distinct from those in the surrounding seawater. Furthermore, 70%
similarity in functional composition was found between U. australis-associated bacterial communities, indicating that
despite the large differences in species composition between hosts (found in
the previous study) many functions are shared, supporting the competitive
lottery model. As a result of these shared functions, authors were able to
define a set of ‘core functions’ to U.
australis-associated bacterial communities, these were; detection and
movement toward host surfaces, attachment and biofilm formation, response to
algal host environment, regulation in response to environmental stimuli,
lateral gene transfer and defense. Finally, after phylogenetic and taxonomic
analysis, it was found that core functions were not restricted to a particular
taxonomic group, suggesting functional equivalence between taxa and further
supporting the competitive lottery model.
This key study by Burke and colleagues highlights the underestimated
importance of genes/gene clusters in understanding community assembly in
bacterial systems. Currently, most theory regarding the understanding of microbial
diversity comes from the study of eukaryote ecology, where genetic coherence within
eukaryotic species can be assumed; therefore the unit of species is relevant. However,
results from this study and an earlier publication Burke et al. (2011a) suggest
the analysis of species composition may tell us little about bacterial
community structure due to the massive amount of genetic exchange between
taxonomically distinct bacteria. Finally, the model used in this study could also be
applicable to other complex host-associated microbial communities, where
species composition is highly variable between hosts, such as the human
microbiome.
Burke, C., Thomas, T., Lewis, M., Steinberg, P. and Kjelleberg, S. (2011) Composition, uniqueness and variability of the epiphytic bacterial community of the green alga Ulva asutralis. The International Society for Mircobial Ecology journal 5. 590-600.
Burke, C., Steinberg, P., Rusch, D., Kjelleberg, S. and Thomans, T. (2011) Bacterial community assembly based on functional genes rather than species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108. 14288-14293.
Burke, C., Steinberg, P., Rusch, D., Kjelleberg, S. and Thomans, T. (2011) Bacterial community assembly based on functional genes rather than species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108. 14288-14293.
Hello Scott,
ReplyDeleteReally enjoyed reading this post!
Would you know if U. australis produces any compounds that might attract bacteria that fill these functional roles?
does ulva produce biogenic compounds to prevent biofilm formation do you think that this may have an influence, such as competitive advantage?
Hey Sean,
ReplyDeleteJudging from the distinct difference in functional genes between seawater and U. australis, there must be some selection mechanism for these roles. The competitive lottery model suggests that the surface of U. australis is composed of many micro-niches which is the sole selection mechanism. However, the production of compounds to attract these functional bacteria could well be another mechanism, though I don't know if this is the case. If this was true, it would be interesting to see if compounds produced by U. australis were then converted by attracted bacteria to something beneficial to host/microbe, in a sort of co-metabolism.
With regards to the production of biogenic compounds, I'm sure I've read this in connection with Ulvacean alga (though can't remember where). However, I think that these biogenic compounds would only influence species composition, and as the functional pools of bacteria may be comprised of many different taxa, this would have little effect in terms of the functional genes present.
Scott.
Yeah that would be really interesting, if that were the case it would be nice to see if the host had any influence in the evolution of of the functional genes.
ReplyDeleteI see how that could be the case with the biogenic compounds,
Thanks a lot,
Sean.