Monitoring environmental health and identifying factors
which affect the health of an ecosystem is very important if we want to
continue to facilitate the use of these areas. Marine sediments and water near
ports are often polluted through leakages of toxic pollutants from the ships
coming into port. Little work has been done on the impacts of ports on marine environments;
however since the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies (like
barcoded pyrosequencing) the ecology of sedimentary microbes has been
extensively studied. What this study aimed to do was to identify bacterial
communities in and around a busy port and hopefully use the bacterial community
composition as a biomarker for environmental health.
They chose 5 sampling sites, two in high port activity,
two in medium port activity, and one control with no port activity. The
toxicity of surface sediments (from an unpublished paper) was found to be
significantly more than the control site and bacterial species richness
decreased as port activity increased. There was a marked difference in
bacterial communities among sites; Proteobacteria
were the dominant phylum in all sediment samples, and significant differences
were seen in the relative abundance of; Acidmicrobiia,
Bacteroidia, δ-proteobacteria, Flavobacteriia, ˠ-proteobacteria,
Sphingobacteriia, Acidmicrobiales, Desulphobacterales, and Rhodobacterales. The Delsulfobacterales which contain
Sulphate-reducing bacteria are important in the degradation of oil hydrocarbons
in the sediments (as well as anaerobic mineralisation of organic compounds), they
were found to have the most difference between port sites and the control site
suggesting the use of this genus as a biomarker for anthropogenic activities.
Conversely, the relative abundance of the Rhodobacterales
was higher in the control site and moderate port activity. Perhaps a ratio
between the relative abundances of Delsulfobacterales
and Rhodobacterales could be used
as a monitoring system or basis for a model? More work would have to be done in
a wider variety of sites and over time in the same sites to establish whether
this is a ubiquitous relationship.
This paper is a good read, very easy to follow and
understand. As far as I can tell they are the first group to use pyrosequencing
to study the effects of an antropogenic influence on bacterial diversity. It
could lead to the development of cheap-easy-to-use methods for the detection of
generic surface antigens common to orders/genera of bacteria.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.