Biofilms are excellent habitats for microorganisms to live
in as they provide protection against stresses like UV radiation, biocides, desiccations,
heavy metals etc. A biofilm is primarily made of extracellular polymeric
substances (EPS) which is secreted by microorganisms. The diversity seen in
microorganisms reflects the diversity in different EPS’s secreted, each species
of bacteria creating an EPS with a unique physical structuring lending specific
properties to each EPS. This structural diversity makes marine EPS a potential
source for commercial application, however few types of EPS have been
characterised. Before tests can be done on the potential of different EPS’s a
library must first be built. The purpose of this study was to quantify the EPS
produced by two early colonising Vibrio
species; V. campbellii, and V. fortis.
The EPS was isolated, characterised, compared and their rheology (the study of
the flow of matter and response of solids to an applied pressure) and
emulsifying potential was studied.
The emulsion of exopolymers produced by both Vibrio’s in this study had similar
capabilities, but compared to previous studies on V. parahaemolyticus the EPS was less stable, although more stable thanes
made by V. harveyi. The EPS of V. campbellii consisted of five sugars
(arabinose, galactose, glucose, mannose and rhamnose) whereas V. fortis was made of only three (arabinose,
galactose and mannose). Using scanning electron microscopy and atomic force
microscopy biofilms the biofilm produced by V.
campbellii was smooth, compact and firmly attached with bacteria whereas V. fortis produced a biofilm that was
loosely bound with bacteria and irregularly shaped, although the exopolymer
itself was compact and porous. The authors conclude that V. campbellii is a faster growing, producing more EPS but less
efficient in biolfilm formation as compared to V. fortis. However, this seems contradictory to the SEM analysis,
unless having an irregularly shaped biofilm is more efficient? This was not fully
discussed in the paper, indeed much of the ‘results and discussion’ section was
lacking in discussion!
The paper was an interesting read, however the impact of the
results could have been discussed further. The need to build an EPS library is
an important task, however first there should be standards set for the
measurement of different EPS. The experiments done in this study did provide
information about the composition and fluidity, but for industrial uses
strength should also be quantitatively measured.
Hi Myles,
ReplyDeleteMy post about Cronobacter spp mentioned that strains have been found to produce inducible and non-inducible EPS. Which means some EPS can be activated in the presence of a specific molecule or substrate. Was there any mention of inducible EPSs present in the two Vibrios sps tested?
Thank you,
Kathryn
Hi Kathryn
ReplyDeleteThis paper did not mention inducible EPS, but did mention the possibility of EPS changing over the course of a bacterium's lifetime. Whether that was through the acquisition of new plasmids that altered the EPS or whether a new type was induced through a new chemical in the environment wasnt discussed!
Myles