As a common method to survive harsh
conditions bacteria enter a viable but non culturable state (VBNC). In this
state metabolic activity is at a minimal level, but as soon at favourable
conditions return they revert to a normal growth. Vibrio vulnificus is recognised as one of the major sea-food
associated pathogens, and it is well known that when water temperatures are
below 15 oC they enter a VBNC state. While it is generally accepted
that bacteria enter this VBNC state, the effects this has on resistance to
environmental stress factors is less well known. Nowakowska and Oliver (2013)
set out to document the effect of several environmental factors on the normal
culturable and VBNC state of V.
vulnificus.
For this study they used two different V. vulnificus strains: C7184 as a
clinical strain and JY170 as an environmental strain. Cultures were either used
for direct exposure to environmental stresses or stored at 5 oC to
induce the VBNC state, after which they were exposed to the stress factors.
Immediately before and after exposure to the challenges a viability assay was
conducted , by determining cell membrane integrity, to determine the effects of
the stresses on the culture. For cells from the VBNC state that were exposed to
the stress factors, they resuscitated by culturing overnight at 22 oC
and then plated onto agar to determine viability. Stress factors applied were:
Temperature, Oxidative stress, Osmotic stress, pH, ethanol, antibiotic and
heavy metals.
Overall results indicate that cells in the
logarithmic growth phase appear to be highly susceptible to the tested
environmental stresses, but that cells from the VBNC state appear to be mostly
resistant. Both the clinical and environmental strains lost culturabillity when
exposed to temperatures over 42 oC, but VBNC cells were able to
recover after overnight resuscitation. The same was found to be the case for
cells exposed to ethanol. When exposed to hypersaline environments log phase
cells for both the clinical and environmental strain lost culturability, but
interestingly the VBNC cells for the clinical were found to be highly
sensitive, where as the environmental strain was found to be significant
resistance. A similar result to the salinity stress was found in response to
oxidative stress and both high and low pH, with the environmental VBNC cells
exhibiting a higher tolerance compared to the other cultures. When cultures
were exposed to antibiotics and heavy metals it was found that yet again the VBNC
cells exhibited a higher level of resistance. Though it appears that there is a
difference depending on the heavy metal compound, with several copper
containing compounds being resisted but others causing cell death.
This study is of interest as many of the
cleaning methods used in the food industry rely on cleaning with highly acidic
or alkaline substances, pasteurisation, or similar methods. This would suggest
that these cleaning methods are ineffective. While the growing cells may be
removed, the VBNC cells may be able to return to a normal logarithmic growth
and cause infection even after supposed cleaning and sterilisation. Overall this
means that while we think we may be safe and the food industry is clean, we may
still be subject to many dangerous pathogens.
Nowakowska, J., Oliver, J., D.. (2013).
Resistance to environmental stresses by Vibrio
vulnificus in the viable but
nonculturable state. FEMS Microbial Ecology. 84, 213-222.
Hi Michiel
ReplyDeleteThis is a very interesting post, the variation in resistance between the environmental and clinical strains were intriguing; were there differences in gene expression? The results mention that the VBNC cells had high tolerance for most stressors; did the authors attempt any further tests using a combination of stress factors? Based on your point that cleaning methods may in fact may be ineffective, combining factors could reduce the recovery of VBNC cells.
Thanks,
Kathryn
Hi,
ReplyDeleteThe paper doesn't state any further tests with combined factors to overcome resistances, though as you suggest I would agree that combining these factors may prove to be fruitful to successfully reduce recovery rates.
For the gene regulation the authors found that for the clinical strains there was no significant difference between the VBNC cells and the logarithmic ones. For the environmental strain they found that there was a significant difference in the expression of relA genes which encode for stress response with the VBNC cells showing less of a response than the logarithmic ones. Which to me seems kind of odd, considering there weren't all that many differences between the clinical and environmental strain.
Michiel