Harmful dinoflagellate blooms caused by Cochlodinium sp.: Global expansion and ecological strategies facilitating bloom
formation:
There are over 40
different species within this group; however this review is looking at only two
of them as these are the ones that are the main harmful algal bloom producers, C.polykrikoides and C.fulvescens. In the 1990’s
these blooms were observed and recorded only in South East Asia and North
America, nowadays the blooms have spread globally occupying areas such as the
whole of Asia and Europe so a mass expansion has occurred within the past two
decades.
The blooms caused by
these two species are strongly ichthytoxic which essentially means poisonous to
fish, however they do still cause mortality within other marine organisms. The
compounds responsible for these blooms are still unknown and due to the recent
expansion and sheer lack of evidence there is a lot less known about this
species compared to other harmful algal bloom causing species.
This review in essence
compares lots of studies and aspects that have been done on this species to try
and come to a conclusion as to why this expansion has occurred so suddenly,
obviously the key observations made are that there is an increase in
anthropogenic factors and/or climate change, and this may be the case but as
mentioned previously due to the sheer lack of evidence no firm conclusions can be
drawn as yet. The general methods used
to study these blooms fall into 3 categories; microscopy, molecular techniques
and remote sensing.
The areas this review
looked at to study were temperature, salinity and grazing. The comparisons
found that both species showed clear overlaps in temperature and salinity
tolerances, with the general habitat and conditions for optimum growth being
moderate temperatures and high salinities, these conditions are often
associated with offshore tropical and sub-tropical areas. It was found that by
altering their chain length these species could survive in altered conditions
down to a low temperature of ten degrees but no lower, and all that they showed
was mild stress. To further back this up it was observed in North America that
some species preferred and could survive in areas that had cool water
intrusions and more brackish salinities. So the results present the fact that
just due to alterations physically these species have been able to relocate to
new niches and survive with only a minor metabolic cost.
Regarding the grazing
concept, as in any environment this species are mildly grazed but it was seen
that when there is a lack of top down control grazing, or even a minor amount
of grazing this species thrived by upping their chain length and therefore
size, so it doesn’t appear that grazing or predation affects the growth or
location of these blooms, evidently if there were predators in a large scale
this might affect the locations but there haven’t been any noted. Finally it
has been noted that under different conditions these two species have a wide
range of nutrient strategies and so have a lot of flexibility, this leads to
the hypothesis that with the fact that nutrients then shouldn’t be a problem
they can survive and move out of their general habitat.
This hasn’t been
studied as to whether this was a recently inherited thing or whether it has
always been present but it poses a possible explanation with the fact that
there is a such a large window of variability with optimum conditions I believe
(and so do the authors) that this is how and why the dinoflagellate blooms have
been able to thrive elsewhere. Especially if climate change is a driver, then
an increase in water temperature will lead to this species being able to thrive
a lot more, it obviously depends on what the salinity levels do but all that
can be hypothesised is that with an increase in temperature there will be a
dramatic increase in the abundance of these species and therefore algal blooms.
Although it is only a
review and to be frank there isn’t that much out there as this review is from
2012 it is still important and poses a lot of useful information and potential
for future studies. It’s only an up and coming field of study, but if these
blooms are spreading and getting a sort of resistance and tolerance to changing
conditions then it needs to be heavily studied before the whole range of oceans
and their inhabitants are in trouble.
Reference:
Kudela,R., Gobler,C. (2012) Harmful dinoflagellate blooms caused by Cochlodinium sp.: Global expansion
and ecological strategies facilitating bloom formation. Harmful Algae 14,
71-86.
The
paper can be located at this website:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.