Many different
bacteria from several environments have the ability to enter a VBNC (viable but
non-culturable) stage when under conditions which prove to be stressful to
survive and function in properly. Included in the bacteria which are capable of
this are a variety of human pathogens, as well as those which infect fish, sea
urchins, and corals etc. The VBNC stage can be induced by temperature changes,
changes in osmotic concentrations, oxygen levels, heavy metals and white light
exposure.
When exposed to such
conditions, cells show a significant amount of size reduction, major decreases
in respiration rates and macromolecular synthesis, but ATP levels and membrane
potential remain high, as well as remaining metabolically active. Seeing as VBNC
cells cannot be cultured, alternative methods were required to prove that they
were alive in this state. Reagents were commonly used which were designed to
show the presence of an intact cytoplasmic membrane. A more recent approach to
demonstrate the viability of these cells is to use a reverse transcriptase PCR,
which detects gene expression. This is used because the half life of bacterial
mRNA is ca. 3-5 minutes, so the continued gene expression by these non culturable
cells shows their viability. It is the later method, amongst other molecular
techniques that have put a stop to the disagreements surrounding the term
‘viable but non-culturable’.
When in the VBNC
state, many pathogens have been observed to be capable of initiating infection,
although not all investigations have reported this. In fact, some reports state
that pathogens are avirulent in this state. However, the most likely case is
that pathogens generally do not have the ability to initiate disease when in
the VBNC state, but the virulence is retained and then initiated upon
resuscitation from the VBNC state (This is often the case in biofilms).
The VBNC state must
only beneficial in terms of survival if they are able to restore their
metabolic activity and become culturable once more. It is difficult to prove
this, as opposed to being able to regrow undetected, culturable cells present
in the VBNC population. Induced VBNC and resuscitation in bacteria is most
extensively studied in Vibrio vulnificus using
temperature in vivo in calms, in situ in estuarine waters, and in vitro.
It has been shown that
several higher organisms may be biological mediators of resuscitation from the
VBNC state. For example, Legionella
pneumophila entered the VBNC state following starvation and hypochlorite
treatment, but was resuscitated once in the protozoans Acanthamoeba polyphaga and A.
castellanii. Another development in the reactivation of dormant cells is
that of the role of Rpfs (Resuscitation-promoting factors). Some Rpfs are
peptidoglycan hydrolases which are involved in cell wall digestion, and
therefore cell division. So peptidoglycan rearrangement appears to be prominent
in VBNC states.
The exact role of VBNC
states in bacteria is yet to be elucidated, but it is likely that the role
varies amongst bacteria. The general understanding is that the VBNC state is
activated to protect the cell from environmental stressors to allow their
survival if and once the stress subsides. What is known is that the VBNC state
is critical to the survival of cells, in particular, human pathogens, and
possibly in their ability to produce disease. This is an important part of VBNC
states as it creates a gateway of research into the reoccurrence of infections
in humans, and in 2009, Epstein proposed that emerging from the VBNC state is a
way of ‘sending out scouts to test the environment’ to ensure it is suitable to
survive in, and in the case of a suitable environment, a signal would be sent
out to resuscitate the remaining cells.
Oliver, J. D. (2009)
Recent findings on the viable but non-culturable state in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS. 34: 415-425.
Hi Hannah,
ReplyDeleteI love the idea that when times are bad some microbes can just effectively go to sleep. I’m considering this as a method to get me through all the stressful deadlines I have this month… if only! I think this is an area which would considerably benefit from more empirical evidence, specifically in identifying what cues, if any, trigger the organisms to go back into normal culturable mode.
You have mentioned a few specific examples which there is some data for and I’m sure there are others, for example Vibrio cholera, but do we have any understanding of how VBNC states affect the overall ecology of microbial systems?
In some cases it is easy to understand the adaptive advantage of VBNC states, especially when successful resuscitation has been shown. However there is also the argument that being metabolically inactive is more likely to cause death. Whilst energy is being conserved in this state, defences are down, processors such as detoxification and coping with oxidative stress and other stressors are likely to be seriously compromised in VBNC which will surely affect survival.
Great post, really nice overview of VBNC!
Thanks,
Vicky
Hey Vicky,
ReplyDeleteThanks, I'm glad you liked my post!
I can't seem to find anything about how VBNC states affect microbial ecology. Although, I think it would be cool if microbial species present differed depending on whether the microbe was in the VBNC state compared to being in its normal state.
I agree that by entering into the VBNC state, the defences of the microbe would definitely be down, but if they entered the state to avoid stressful conditions in the first place I suppose it would just be a lose-lose situation for the microbe!
Hannah
Reading your review I became quite interested in what seemed to be a medical implication of VBNC microbes, do you think it possible that there is an immunological application for VBNC research?
ReplyDeleteDanny
Yes, I believe it definitely has the potential to open doors to biomedical advances. Although, I think more research is needed to understand more about the triggering of VBNC and resuscitation in these cells before that can happen.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you found it interesting!