Wednesday, 23 January 2013

Stepping Stones in the Deep


Stepping Stones in the Deep

Deep sea habitats such as seeps and vents are ephemeral. Organisms which inhabit these temporally restricted niches are thought to rely on larval dispersal over great distances to ensure the success of the next generation. It has been hypothesised that large food falls such as whale carcasses, fallen logs or kelp falls could provide stepping stones from one habitat to the next. Previous studies using experimental whale sinks have documented the colonisation of carcasses by highly adapted chemosynthetic organisms found at vents and seeps. Findings such as these support the stepping stone hypothesis. However little is known about how chemosynthetic organisms are attracted organic falls and the biogeochemical and microbial processors which create sulfidic niches from wood falls. In particular there is some mystery surrounding cellulose and lignin degradation as it is normally very slow in anoxic conditions. In the reviewed study Bienhold et al., (2013) aimed to investigate the processors at large food falls which lead to the production of methane and sulphur compounds, providing an energy source for chemosynthetic vent and seep organisms on their journey through the desert of the deep sea.

Bienhold et al., (2013) set up a clever field experiment in which they sunk logs at various distances from an active methane seep in the Mediterranean (1700 metres deep). Log sites were sampled using a ROV after 1 year, samples were taken from the surrounding sediment as well as the logs. The study combined a comprehensive set of in-situ and ex-situ measurements in order to collect biogeochemical data such as oxygen uptake, sulphide and oxygen concentration and pH. In order to characterise the associated microbial communities, methods such as direct cell counts and in depth 454 sequencing were used.

Concurring with previous work, Bienhold et al., (2013) found that wood-boring bivalves transform carbon from the wood into energy which can be digested by other organisms, they can therefore be considered keystone species. Biogeochemical data showed that oxygen consumption increased at the logs compared to control sediment samples, they also found sulphidic compounds increased at the log sites. The authors used an interesting calculation based on carbon content and organism biomass to estimate it would take 35years for all the wood-derived carbon to be used up. With regards to microbial community, there was a two fold increase in microbe cell count number after a year of submersion. 454 sequencing revealed a community shift from Gammaproteobacteria dominance when the logs were first sunk to a dominance of Actinobacteria after one year. More specifically, after one year, the dominant genus was Demequina, of which isolates were shown to be closely related to Cellulomonas fermentans (cellulolytic bacteria), indicating that the Demequina genus could be of major importance for wood degradation, and hence carbon cycling, in the deep sea. Taxa containing sulphate reducing bacteria were also found on the logs.

Transcriptomics will provide the next step forward in this type of work and will aid a deeper, mechanistic understanding of the processors involved in the production of sulphidic niches at fallen food sites. More information is required on the metabolically active members of the microbial consortium as well as information on specific functions and pathways carried out by the microbes. Furthermore it would be nice to see temporal sequence experiments to provide more detailed data on succession. I think the evolutionary significance of this work has been overlooked by the authors and I would be interested to discuss this further…

Bienhold, C., Pop Ristova, P., Wenzhöfer, F., Dittmar, T., & Boetius, A. (2013). How Deep-Sea Wood Falls Sustain Chemosynthetic Life. (D. L. Kirchman, Ed.)PLoS ONE, 8(1), e53590.

5 comments:

  1. Hi Vicky,

    I agree this area of research would benefit from a study of the succession, do the authers mention any of the other organisms present?.Also,do the authers mention how the bivalves find the log, are they common in the deepsea?
    I am curious about your last comment, what do you think the evolutionary significance is?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Matt,

      Thanks for the comment! Yep they found loads of cool organisms, there are some really good photos and schematics in the paper so I definitely recommend you have a look. Currently there is only speculation with regard to how organisms localise these ephemeral habitats, I suspect it will be some sort of chemotactic response. There is very little known about the reproduction and life history/dispersal patterns. It is certain the wood-boring bivalves depend on these types of falling events to maintain their population. Which kind of links onto evolution… It appears the bivalves have evolved to be expert colonisers in the desert of the deep sea.

      This paper has provided additional evidence for the stepping stone hypothesis. The deep sea is often described as a stable oligotrophic habitat, in which case it is likely many deep sea organisms have evolved under stabilising selection for a constant environment. In the case of vent and seep organisms however, it is difficult to comprehend the evolution of organisms adapted to ephemeral, nutrient rich, habitats present on a background desert of the deep sea. The evolutionary picture becomes even more complex when the symbiotic relationships of many of the organisms are considered. Not only do the organism’s larvae have to make use of the stepping stones, but also their symbiotic bacteria and the microbes required to create the sulphidic niches.

      Can you shed any light on this??


      Thanks,
      Vicky

      Delete
  2. Hi Vickie Harri has also just reviewed this paper if you fancy a good discussion...

    Does this paper mention anything about how the bivalves are able to locate these logs? Do you think that the important role these organisms play in transfering energy from the wood to other trophic levels takes some of the limelight from the bacteria?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Vickie argues a very good point i didnt consider in response to my previous question. its on Harri's blog

    ReplyDelete
  4. Discussion continues on Harri’s blog “Rotting wood never looked so good” ...

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.