Marine
viruses are affecting all living species and organisms within the marine environment;
they have also been shown through much study that they have the ability to
change another species ontogeny and life history. Previous virology study has
concentrated mostly on two areas, pathogenic impact and also the virus ability
to influence the food webs. Viruses have severe impacts on conservation,
various pathogens are known to cause great problems in different species, an
example given by this paper was sea-turtle fibropapillomatosis and shrimp white
spot syndrome, these two diseases have two different impacts in this area, one
being fish sustainability with in the shrimp farming industry and the other the
sea turtles of which some species are known to be registered on the endangered
species act.
Advances in
virology have allowed our scientific knowledge to grow considerably and learn
how viruses work; this paper concentrates on the marine system. Improved
methodology over the past 10-15 years, science has bloomed from the
investigation of viral and protist contribution to plankton to RNA virome
sequencing. With the measurement of viral diversity problems occur due the
culturing difficulties and their lack of the more common universally conserved genes.
Through other techniques such as the mentioned shot gun sequencing it was
possible to show that scientists have underestimated population and diversity
and due to these new effects that viruses have on other species its seen that
these have a significant impact on the host adaptation.
The paper
explains how the viruses are able to manipulate genes and modify marine organism’s
ontogeny. Until recently papers have speculated mainly on the negative effects
of the host modification of the virus, but many of these modifications are known
to have very positive effects i.e. the cyanobacteria “Synechococcus” which through the horizontal transfer of genes
associated with the Ps(II) system it allows the functionality of photosynthesis
that is a necessity for the function and existence of this bacteria.
It is suggested that ecological niches of various species in nature are
made possible by phage populations found there and it is these that act as a
“gene reservoir”, by this it means the ability for many different viruses to
carry different many different genes that are exchanged to the hosts and
exploited through adaptation. The psB A gene used to encode the ps(II) co-reactions
are passed on through gene transfer from host to host originally seen to be
passed on by horizontal transfer from phage and its estimated that roughly 10% of this transfer is responsible for total
global photosynthesis. One of the most incredible effects is also carried out
by transformation,
where by the common known cholera bacterium Vibrio cholerae, by incorporating the CTX gene becomes a disease
highly dangerous to humanity, and is
even able to gain the ability to be anti biotic resistant.
Viromes
are used regularly for particular hosts to acquire various genes used for
specific adaptations, high abundance of genes found in high pressure
environments such as hydrothermal vents are found to be used by microbial
communities adapting and evolving to
capitalise and maintain life in that
difficult environment. It is thought that around 1024 genes a year
are transferred through transduction,
but by studying the GTA’s numbers could
be much higher as these phage types have smaller DNA and these only transfer
host DNA to the bacterium, which appears to be a highly efficient system.
Several
viruses have now been found to be able to move genetic material and information
from not just a one organism to another but from one environment to a completely
unrelated environment, so..... could total world wide diversity, marine and
terrestrial, be limited or allowed expansion by the global movement of virions?
With
the discovery of the Mimivirus, some of the largest viruses known to man, study
was carried out to see if transfer was greater due to size, it would seem that
even though bigger with 1.2 megabases and genetically more complex, horizontal
transfer is less common than in the previously spoken about phage. A study was
conducted in Plymouth looking at a particular species of coccolithophorid Emiliania
huxleyi, this species is known to go through a boom or bust cycle whereby
they bloom at an astonishing rate and then vanish. This was thought to be
caused by a specific virus associated with E.huxleyi
, using satellite imagery looking for cell reflection it was seen that the area
was low in this species of coccoliths but high in the associated virus and free
coccoliths suggesting that the E.huxleyi went
through lysis caused by infection of the virus. To conclude this experiment,
two coccolithovirus were isolated and the genome sequenced from these showed to
be a 400kb marine viral genome known to contain the genes capable of ceramide
production.
What
I find particularly interesting in this paper is the ability of certain species
such as the E.huxleyi even though they display resistance to this
virus, the virus its self manages to adapt to these changes known as “The Red
Queen” hypothesis. But even though these viral adaptations to the resistance
the coccolith occur, the host manages to
perform what has been coined “The Cheshire Cat” whereby it utilises two life
stages in order to avoid the virus all together and “disappear”.
It
amazes me how in the last 15 or so years with increase of technology we have
seen how viruses once thought to have purely negative impacts on nearly all
ecosystems, have been proven not just to have advantageous impacts but imperative for the increase and depth of
the global gene pool, the ability for species to mingle genetically and benefit
from each other in many ways. Also for species to still manage to find ways in
order adapt, to the fight of flight mechanism of dealing with the harmful
pathogens.
To
read this paper further please see below.
Rohwer,
Forest, and Rebecca Vega Thurber. "Viruses manipulate the marine
environment." Nature 459.7244 (2009): 207-212.
Hi James,
ReplyDeleteAs you expressed interest in the potential positive impacts of viruses, I thought you might be interested in reading the papers below, which discusses ideas on the impacts of viruses on corals:
Oppen, Madeleine J. H., Jo-Ann Leong, and Ruth D. Gates. 2009. “Coral-virus Interactions: A Double-edged Sword?” Symbiosis 47
http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF03179964
Marhaver, Kristen L, Robert a Edwards, and Forest Rohwer. 2008. “Viral Communities Associated with Healthy and Bleaching Corals.” Environmental Microbiology 10
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2702503&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
One idea the authors in the paper above discuss is the that of bacteriophage as top down controllers of coral-associrated bacteria, which I find particularly interesting. As well facilitators of horizontal gene transfer, phage may be acting to control coral pathogens!
I hope you find these papers interesting.
Jo
Hi Joe,thank you for those papers :) to be honest i think the fact that we now have the technology available to look deeper in to marine viruses and their positive impacts with in ecosystems we will see more and more of their incorporation in the evolution of marine organisms. I will have a read of them, i have briefly looked over the Gates 2009 paper but will give a better read soon. Thanks for reading :)
ReplyDelete